ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.4 SECTION XV
S U P R E M E C O U R T
O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IA No.3 In Petition(s) for
Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)
No(s).29956-29957/2011
L.I.C. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
KRISHNA MURARI LAL ASTHANA &
ORS. ETC. Respondent(s)
(With appln(s) for clarification
and office report)
Date: 17/10/2012 This I.A. was
called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU
JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
For Petitioner(s) Dr.A.M.Singhvi, Sr.Adv.
Mr.Parag P.Tripathy, Sr.Adv.
Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, Adv.
Mr.Surajit Bhaduri, Adv.
For Respondent(s)/ Mr.Amarendra Sharan, Sr.Adv.
Applicant Mr.R.K.Singh, Adv.
Mr.Kumar Gaurav, Adv.
Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Adv.
Mr.Aakash D.Pratap, Adv.
Ms.Vimla Sinha, Adv.
Ms.Sushma Suri, A.O.R.
UPON hearing counsel the Court
made the following
O R D E R
I.A.No.3 of 2012 In SLP(C)
No.29957 of 2011
This is an application by the respondent
for clarification of order dated 14.11.2011.
We have heard Shri Amarendra Sharan, learned senior counsel for the applicant
and Dr.A.M.Singhvi, learned senior
counsel for the
SLP-petitioner and are
satisfied that order
dated 14.11.2011 needs
to be clarified so that neither
party may remain
under a mistaken
impression about the purport of this Court's order.
In view of the above, paragraph 3
of order dated 14.11.2011 is substituted with the following:
"In the meanwhile, the
proceedings pending before the High Court under the Contempt of Courts Act,
1971 shall remain stayed subject to the condition that within eight weeks from
today, the petitioner shall deposit in the Registry of the High Court the amount
due to the pensioners i.e. the writ
petitioners with effect from
the date of
their eligibiity to
get retiral benefits."
I.A. No.3 of 2012 is disposed of
in the manner indicated above.
As a sequel to disposal of
I.A.No.3 of 2012, I.A.No.4 of
2012
in I.A.No.3 of 2012 in
SLP(C)No.29957 of 2011 is also disposed of.
(Satish K.Yadav) (Phoolan Wati
Arora)
Court Master Court Master
No comments:
Post a Comment