30-10-2012 - Message of Shri KML Asthana

Forwarded Message
From: asthana_jaipur ASTHANA <asthana_jaipur@yahoo.co.in>

Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 12:23 AM

PL PUT THE FOLLOWING MESSAGE ON THE BLOG FOR INFORMATION OF ALL CONCERNED
KML ASTHANA
DEAR ALL
I AM GETTING INFORMATIONS FROM SOME QUARTERS THAT SOME UNION/
ASSOCIATIONS ARE PLANNING TO MAKE APPLICATION FOR IMPLEADMENT IN OUR SLP. THESE PERSONS EITHER INDIVIDUALLY OR AS OFFICE BEARERS OF SOME ASSOCIATION ARE APPARENTLY AND VIVIDLY PLAYING IN THE HANDS OF MANAGEMENT AND ARE OUT TO DELAY THE RESULT OF SLP ONE WAY OR THE OTHER. WHILE I EXPECT TO GET THE SLP DECIDED WITHIN TWO THREE MONTHS ANY SUCH MOVE ON THEIR PART SHOULD IT COME WILL DELAY THE DECISION AT LEAST BY THREE FOUR YEARS AND THAT IS THE DESIRE OF THE MANAGEMENT TO SOMEHOW FRUSTRATE OUR MOVE IN THE BATTLE WHICH THEY HAVE ALMOST LOST.
PL BEWARE AND OPPOSE ANY SUCH MOVE WHICH IS DESCTRUCTIVE AND ADVERSE TO THE WELL BEING OF LIC PENSIONERS. OTHERWISE IT IS NOT UNDERSTANDABLE AS TO WHAT PURPOSE THEY WANT TO GAIN BY THIS MOVE BECAUSE ONCE WE WIN IN THE SLP THE BENEFIT WILL BE PAYABLE TO ONE AND ALL THROUGH OUT THE LENGTH AND BREADTH OF THE COUNTRY, FOR THEY SHOULD REMEMBER THE GRATUITY CASE AS ALSO THE PRINCIPLE OF LAW THAT ONE REGULATION CANNOT BE APPLIED DIFFERENTLY TO DIFFERENT PERSONS.
MAY GOD GIVE THEM BETTER COUNSEL THAT THEY SHOULD NOT DELAYOUR COURSE OF VICTORY WHICH IS FOR ONE AND ALL.
KML ASTHANA

Supreme Court Case - Order Dated 17-10-2012


ITEM NO.3               COURT NO.4             SECTION XV


S U P R E M E   C O U R T   O F   I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

IA No.3 In Petition(s) for
Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).29956-29957/2011

L.I.C.                                            Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

KRISHNA MURARI LAL ASTHANA & ORS. ETC.            Respondent(s)

(With appln(s) for clarification and office report)

Date: 17/10/2012 This I.A. was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA

For Petitioner(s)       Dr.A.M.Singhvi, Sr.Adv.
Mr.Parag P.Tripathy, Sr.Adv.
Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, Adv.
Mr.Surajit Bhaduri, Adv.

For Respondent(s)/      Mr.Amarendra Sharan, Sr.Adv.
Applicant               Mr.R.K.Singh, Adv.
Mr.Kumar Gaurav, Adv.
Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Adv.

Mr.Aakash D.Pratap, Adv.
Ms.Vimla Sinha, Adv.
Ms.Sushma Suri, A.O.R.

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R

I.A.No.3 of 2012 In SLP(C) No.29957 of 2011

This is an application by the respondent for clarification of order dated 14.11.2011.

We have heard  Shri Amarendra Sharan,  learned senior counsel for the applicant and  Dr.A.M.Singhvi, learned  senior  counsel  for  the  SLP-petitioner and are  satisfied  that  order  dated  14.11.2011  needs  to  be clarified so that neither party  may  remain  under  a  mistaken  impression about the purport of this Court's order.

In view of the above, paragraph 3 of order dated 14.11.2011 is substituted with the following:

"In the meanwhile, the proceedings pending before the High Court under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 shall remain stayed subject to the condition that within eight weeks from today, the petitioner shall deposit in the Registry of the High Court the amount due to the pensioners i.e. the writ  petitioners  with effect  from  the  date  of  their  eligibiity  to  get  retiral benefits."

I.A. No.3 of 2012 is disposed of in the manner indicated above.
As a sequel to disposal of I.A.No.3 of 2012,  I.A.No.4  of  2012
in I.A.No.3 of 2012 in SLP(C)No.29957 of 2011 is also disposed of.


(Satish K.Yadav)                              (Phoolan Wati Arora)
Court Master                                    Court Master




Supreme Court Case - Order Dated 16-10-2012


          MATTER FOR 17.10.2012           COURT NO.            ITEM NO.

                                 SECTION-XV
                        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                        CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                       INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 3
                       (Application for Clarification)
                                     IN
        PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NOS.29956-57/2011

L.I.C.                                              ...PETITIONER
                                      VERSUS
KRISHNA MURARI LAL ASTHANA & ORS. ETC.        ... RESPONDENTS

                                              OFFICE REPORT
   
  The Interlocutory Application No. 3 above-mentioned was mentioned before the Hon'ble Court on 10.10.2012 when the Hon'ble Court was pleased to pass the following order:
      "Taken on Board.
      Shri Ashok Panigrahi, learned counsel for the petitioner requests for time to enable his client to file reply to the interlocutory application.
      The request is accepted.
      Put up on 17.10.2012."

      It is submitted for information of the Hon'ble Court that   Mr.  Ashok Panigrahi, counsel for the petitioner has on 16.10.2012 filed the  reply  to the Interlocutory Application No. 3 and an application to  bring  Additional Facts which are being circulated with this office report.
     It is further submitted that Mr. R.P. Goyal, counsel for respondent
No. 1 has  on  12.10.2012  filed  an  application  for  permission  to  file Additional Documents in I.A. No. 3 alongwith Annexures.  Copy of the same is being circulated with this office report for the kind perusal of the Hon'ble Court.
      The Interlocutory application above-mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report.
      Dated this the 16th day of October, 2012.
                                                         ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Copy to:-   Mr. R.P. Goyal, Adv.
            Mr. A.V. Rangam, Adv.
            Mr. B.K. Prasad, Adv.
            Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, Adv.
                                                  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
3/as/off report

Supreme Court  Case No 29956/57 - 10-10-2012


ITEM NO.MM-4A COURT NO.4 SECTION XV
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IA No.3 in
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).29956-29957/2011
(From the judgement and order dated 19/08/2011 in DBSA No.493/2010,DBSA
No.494/2010,DBCRP No.86/2011,DBCRP No.87/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF
RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR)
L.I.C. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
KRISHNA MURARI LAL ASTHANA & ORS. ETC. Respondent(s)
(for clarification)
Date: 10/10/2012 This IA in Petitions was called on for mentioning today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ashok Panigrahi,Adv.
Mr. Shiv Kanungo, Adv.
Mr. Surajit Bhaduri, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. R.K. Singh, Adv.
Mr.Kumar Gaurav, Adv.
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
Taken on Board.
Shri Ashok Panigrahi, learned counsel for the petitioner requests for time
to enable his client to file reply to the interlocutory application.
The request is accepted.
Put up on 17.10.2012.
|(Parveen Kr.Chawla) | |(Phoolan Wati Arora) |
|Court Master |                    |Court Master |